Bibliometric indicators for evaluating the quality of scientifc publications.
نویسنده
چکیده
Evaluation of quality and quantity of publications can be done using a set of statistical and mathematical indices called bibliometric indicators. Two major categories of indicators are (1) quantitative indicators that measure the research productivity of a researcher and (2) performance indicators that evaluate the quality of publications. Bibliometric indicators are important for both the individual researcher and organizations. They are widely used to compare the performance of the individual researchers, journals and universities. Many of the appointments, promotions and allocation of research funds are based on these indicators. This review article describes some of the currently used bibliometric indicators such as journal impact factor, crown indicator, h-index and it's variants. It is suggested that for comparison of scientific impact and scientific output of researchers due consideration should be given to various factors affecting theses indicators.
منابع مشابه
A Bibliometric Analysis of Hematological Research Productivity among Five Islamic Countries during 1996 to 2013 (a 17-years period)
Background: This study made an attempt to make the quantitative and qualitative evaluation of hematological research output in five Islamic countries Iran, Turkey, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia and Egypt which have the most scientific productions from 1996-2013. Materials and Methods: The current study was carried out during the 1st to 31st of September, 2014 in Blood Transfusion Research Center, Sh...
متن کاملJudging merits in the age of the h-index: Citizen bibliometrics in biomedicine and economics
The number of publications has been a fundamental merit in the competition for academic positions since the late 18 century. Today, the simple counting of publications has been supplemented with a whole range of bibliometric measures, which supposedly not only measures the volume of research but also its impact. In this study, we investigate how bibliometrics are used for evaluating the impact ...
متن کاملA New Scale for Rating Scientific Publications
Introduction Citation-based bibliometric indicators are increasingly being used for evaluating research. This reflects the need of decision-makers to increase the efficiency of allocating resources to research institutions and scientists, while also keeping manageable and cost-effective the evaluation process that grounds the allocation of resources. There often is much room of improvement in h...
متن کاملA Bibliometric Analysis of Toxicology Publications of Iran and Turkey in ISI Web of Science
Background: Web of Science (WoS) is an online academic citation index provided by Thomson Reuters which supplies valuable bibliometric information for comparing impact of specific author, organization, or country in science production. The aim of this study was to compare toxicology publications of Iran and Turkey indexed in WoS from bibliometric point of view. Methods: The WoS database was ...
متن کاملResearch and Collaboration Overview of Institut Pasteur International Network: A Bibliometric Approach toward Research Funding Decisions
Background Institut Pasteur International Network (IPIN), which includes 32 research institutes around the world, is a network of research and expertise to fight against infectious diseases. A scientometric approach was applied to describe research and collaboration activities of IPIN. Methods Publications were identified using a manual search of IPIN member addresses in Science Citation Inde...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- The journal of contemporary dental practice
دوره 15 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014